KEQU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Woodmark has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of 4.17%. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat American Woodmark's return on equity of 11.05%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.26%. On the other hand American Woodmark has an analysts' consensus of $91.67 which suggests that it could grow by 54.97%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Kewaunee Scientific, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Kewaunee Scientific.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Woodmark has a beta of 1.582, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.196%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Woodmark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Woodmark pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are smaller than American Woodmark quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is lower than American Woodmark's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.79x while American Woodmark's PE ratio is 9.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.54x versus 0.52x for American Woodmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of 3.8%. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -5.58%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.26%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.94%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Kewaunee Scientific, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Kewaunee Scientific.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.269%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.79x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.54x versus 0.42x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of --. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.26%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.84%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Kewaunee Scientific, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Kewaunee Scientific.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.79x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.54x versus 127.45x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of --. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.26%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kewaunee Scientific has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Kewaunee Scientific is more attractive than Northann.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.79x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.54x versus 0.35x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.